Adams Cs12 Bloggs
Monday, March 11, 2013
Obama use of social network
As the political season continues, the Obama campaign has dominated new
media, capitalizing on a trend. Americans
are more able to access media-rich content online; 55 percent have
broadband Internet connections at home, double the figure for spring
2004. Social-networking technologies have matured, and more Americans
are comfortable with them. Although the 2004 Dean campaign broke ground
with its online meeting technologies and blogging, "people didn't quite
have the facility," says Lawrence Lessig, a Stanford law professor who
has given the Obama campaign Internet policy advice. "The world has now
caught up with the
technology." The Obama campaign, he added, recognized this early: "The
key networking advance in the Obama field operation was really deploying
community-building tools in a smart way from the very beginning. The
Obama team used the internet very effectively. The conservatives could
learn from this. If
I were going to suggest one strategy to the Freepers (and other
interested parties) for the remaining campaign season, I would suggest
having a daily message that I would encourage conservatives to discuss
with others around the water cooler or over the backyard fence. That's
one way we can combat the missing, distorted, and biased information put
out by the MSM. We could tackle just one important point each day.
Comparing Ted, Ny Books and Wired
In the 9 minute video TED talk Eli shares his experiences with internet
filters which shape the information we are presented with on a daily
basis. It does not matter if we are looking at Google or Facebook, the
information we get to see - whether it is search results or news - is
tailored to what software algorithms think we might want to see based on
data collected on our behavior as a user thus we are always seeing a
distorted picture of reality on the web.
Since these computer rules are lacking any form of ethics their choice on what information we are presented with can harm the freedom that the internet was supposed to provide us with and that is central to our society. If any information that makes us feel uncomfortable or that contains a different point of view is edited out, the world we get to see online becomes increasingly distorted and our worldview will neither be challenged nor broadened due to this filtering of information.
In Clive Thompsons article there is a particularly when it comes to current events and news, there is this importance placed on hearing "both sides." I understand that a story is observed from different perspectives, but the fact is that some perspectives are less wrong than others. So, getting more ideas from a group that is consistently getting their information from the less correct analysis is going to get you less accurate information.
Since these computer rules are lacking any form of ethics their choice on what information we are presented with can harm the freedom that the internet was supposed to provide us with and that is central to our society. If any information that makes us feel uncomfortable or that contains a different point of view is edited out, the world we get to see online becomes increasingly distorted and our worldview will neither be challenged nor broadened due to this filtering of information.
In Clive Thompsons article there is a particularly when it comes to current events and news, there is this importance placed on hearing "both sides." I understand that a story is observed from different perspectives, but the fact is that some perspectives are less wrong than others. So, getting more ideas from a group that is consistently getting their information from the less correct analysis is going to get you less accurate information.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Goods and bads of social networking
Frontline takes us viewers inside the private worlds that
kids are creating online, by raising important questions about how the Internet
is transforming the experience of adolescence. At school, teachers are trying
to figure out how to reach a generation that no longer reads books or
newspapers. The fear of online predators has led teachers and parents to mainly
focus on keeping kids safe online. But many young people think that these fears
are outrageous. Online media has also intensified the significance of adolescence
as teens create and play with identities on sites like MySpace and Facebook and
encounter intense peer pressure in a virtual world. Parents are confused about
how to respond to the increasingly private worlds inhabited by their children,
lacking an understanding of both the creative potential and the genuine risks
of this new cultural environment.
Frontline interviews kids, parents
and educators about the experiences of youth, how they affect home life,
identity, and education, and how kids online lives often spin out of their
control. Adolescence is playing out, often in the physical world as well as the
"always on" digital world of social networking web sites like Myspace and Facebook. Kids are
extending their social world into an area without the adult order and
supervision of their home, community and school environments. This often
presents complex versions of classic issues (like bullying, a.k.a.
"cyberbullying") that kids, parents, and schools are having a hard
time understanding and adapting to.
Growing up provides access to the
behavior and perspective of today's students that can help us find new
connections to their ways of seeing the world, regardless of how those efforts
are integrated into your way teaching.
The world has clearly changed for teenagers. Technology
rules, and childhood or so the insightful documentary GROWING UP ONLINE posits
will never be the same again. Over the course of Rachel Dretzin's film,
parents, tweens, teens, scholars, teachers, and security experts make sense of
the Internet’s impact on growing up. Is it really rife with bogeymen waiting to
pounce and pitfalls that could determine no, ruin kids' future? Or is online life
more about what you make of it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)